More on strictification

Another fascinating day! At lunch time Steve Lack told me some interesting things about the strictification operator for bicategories. Apparently section 5.6 of [GPS] is wrong, and Steve reckons Gray is probably not triequivalent to Bicat. (The mistake in 5.6 is in the very first sentence: the trihomomorphism M: B → Gray constructed there is not actually a triequivalence! Although it’s locally a biequivalence by construction, it fails to be triessentially surjective.)

On the other hand, Steve mentioned a sense in which strictification does produce a (Quillen) equivalence: see his paper here. Perhaps this is my cue to finally learn about model categories…

This entry was posted in category theory, news. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s